<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nrf24 EN300440 v2.1.1 Receiver Blocking</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/37232/nrf24-en300440-v2-1-1-receiver-blocking</link><description>I have a product using the nrf24L01+ going through the new CE testing for EN300440 v2.1.1. The lab is asking me how to setup for &amp;quot;receiver blocking&amp;quot; test according to 4.3.4 of https://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_en/300400_300499/300440/02.01.01_30/en_300440v020101v</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:46:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/37232/nrf24-en300440-v2-1-1-receiver-blocking" /><item><title>RE: nrf24 EN300440 v2.1.1 Receiver Blocking</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/143927?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:46:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:94324928-257d-48e9-b79a-ee285bab746e</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like a mistake in the documentation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regardless, the packet should match the payload defined on the receiver. From nRFgo SDK 2.3.0.10040\source_code\lib\rf_test\rf_test.c:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp; uint8_t default_payload[MAX_SIZE_PACKET] = {0xaa, 0x1b, 0x2c, 0x10, 0x81, 0x01, 0x11, 0x1a,&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0xfe, 0xee, 0xcd, 0x12, 0x13, 0xa9, 0x92, 0x13,&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0x14, 0x17, 0x7d, 0x12, 0xdf, 0xfd, 0xaa, 0xaf,&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0x27, 0x65, 0x41, 0x43, 0x3a, 0x2d, 0xc1, 0x55};&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrf24 EN300440 v2.1.1 Receiver Blocking</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/143773?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:42:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:21853c11-3bdf-4d67-998d-1b76ce483ca2</guid><dc:creator>Slivings</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good afternoon,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a follow-up question. I am following the test instructions that you referenced nan_24-08, and in Chapter 6, Table 15, there is a Tx payload setup. This table shows a total of 59 or 60 bytes of payload data. I am not sure I am understanding what I should define as my expected payload.&amp;nbsp;Would you please help me understand this recommended packet build?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nrf24 EN300440 v2.1.1 Receiver Blocking</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/143523?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 09:31:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fe01b6a5-43c7-4315-9277-c85dc0c02b39</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is what we have on the subject:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RF test instructions, chapter 6: &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nan_24-08.pdf"&gt;http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nan_24-08.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And also RF Performance Test Guidelines:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.nordic.infocenter.whitepapers%2Fdita%2Fwhitepapers%2Fpdflinks%2Fnwp_006.html&amp;amp;cp=11_20"&gt;http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.nordic.infocenter.whitepapers%2Fdita%2Fwhitepapers%2Fpdflinks%2Fnwp_006.html&amp;amp;cp=11_20&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>