<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Question on QSPI(NAND) &amp;amp; SPI</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/38032/question-on-qspi-nand-spi</link><description>I was in the process of integrating a NAND flash to my project. - MX35LFxGE4AB 
 Initially, I thought it would be good idea to use QSPI, but it seems to only support NOR flash. 
 Also, in the nrf52840 datasheet( http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nRF52840_OPS_v0</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:17:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/38032/question-on-qspi-nand-spi" /><item><title>RE: Question on QSPI(NAND) &amp; SPI</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/263472?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2020 14:17:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:912ee44b-554d-4da5-bb44-28d9a437b593</guid><dc:creator>Constantin</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Any progress in the meantime?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Question on QSPI(NAND) &amp; SPI</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/168962?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 01:00:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c0977cf5-a6b7-4d57-ad8c-f79b3b5959ae</guid><dc:creator>Mihal</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;as i can see W25N01GVZEIG has &amp;quot;read status register&amp;quot; command and it&amp;#39;s NAND.&amp;nbsp; but i still don&amp;#39;t know how to work with it properly&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Question on QSPI(NAND) &amp; SPI</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/148459?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:58:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ba51c4f6-0733-45df-9589-f1a0b6e9d9a4</guid><dc:creator>Jong yoon lee</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Any update?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Question on QSPI(NAND) &amp; SPI</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/146814?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 15:07:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:329ef056-7565-4134-b91c-778feb5ac8dc</guid><dc:creator>Jong yoon lee</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your thoughtful answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding communicating with NAND flash, I was concerned about the status check that is being done on a write and read operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;QSPI does a `Read Register Status` - 05h to do a&amp;nbsp; Memory status check before a read/write/erase. The peripheral&amp;nbsp;will pull this register until it is in the state needed. However, this is only a feature in a NOR flash and non of the NAND flash I looked into doesn&amp;#39;t support the&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;`Read Register Status`&amp;nbsp; command.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Is there a way to bypass this memory status check?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Question on QSPI(NAND) &amp; SPI</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/146803?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:50:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d2b6269b-5167-4344-b2cd-27bcc7b1941b</guid><dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, you&amp;#39;re referring to an old version of the datasheet. See &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.nrf52/dita/nrf52/chips/nrf52840.html?cp=2_0"&gt;v1 instead&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NAND flash should be possible to use as far as I know. This is just the underlying technology, if the interface is compatible it should not matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We do not have current consumption data for this unfortunately. Still, at this frequency this is something that is wildly dependent on trace and load capacitance, which you therefore would have to measure in your own board .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regarding the formula, should there not be only &amp;#39;bits&amp;#39; in the numerator? This leaves&amp;nbsp;time needed to transfer e.g. 5000 bits, which when multiplied with the current draw leads to charge (mAh) used in the transaction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>