<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NRF_LOG_ERROR should be coded not NRF_LOG_DEBUG for error conditions</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39084/nrf_log_error-should-be-coded-not-nrf_log_debug-for-error-conditions</link><description>NRF_LOG_ERROR should be coded not NRF_LOG_DEBUG for error conditions. 
 Not only will the log calls not be compiled and not displayed if 
 NRF_LOG_DEFAULT_LEVEL is less than 4 
 but also presenting. DEBUG: xxx messages are misleading where they are really</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 11:30:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39084/nrf_log_error-should-be-coded-not-nrf_log_debug-for-error-conditions" /><item><title>RE: NRF_LOG_ERROR should be coded not NRF_LOG_DEBUG for error conditions</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/151210?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 11:30:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8ddd03ce-525e-4d42-b01e-1f90f00042df</guid><dc:creator>bjorn-spockeli</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dennis,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the we&amp;#39;ve tried to reduce the size of the bootloader as much as possible, hence a lot of the logging calls have been set to the debug level rather than error. I also think that&amp;nbsp;our developers will not view some of the cases as errors, but debug information, but this is subjective.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I will forward your feedback to the developers through our internal issues database. They will then review the feedback in the next development cycle.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bjørn&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>