<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>what the TID (Transaction number) means?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39233/what-the-tid-transaction-number-means</link><description>Hello, I read in the documentation how to create a model, in the client model, which defines a struct: simple_on_off_msg_set_t {uint8_t on_off, uint8_t tid}. I do not understand what the TID (Transaction number) means? Why use it?</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 13:55:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39233/what-the-tid-transaction-number-means" /><item><title>RE: what the TID (Transaction number) means?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/152083?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 13:55:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:73d51a60-bf07-45c9-93e3-ab99df8e54b9</guid><dc:creator>Joakim Jakobsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TID (Transaction number) is supposed to be used to differentiate between which message is the &amp;quot;last&amp;quot; received command. &lt;br /&gt;In Mesh, a sequence &amp;quot;On&amp;quot; then &amp;quot;Off&amp;quot; may be sent. But on the receiving side this might be recieved as &amp;quot;Off&amp;quot; then &amp;quot;On&amp;quot;, depending on the route it took. &lt;br /&gt;The TID let&amp;#39;s you determine whih was the last command that was sent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which SDK are you working with? &lt;br /&gt;I would suggest upgrading to the latest nRF5 SDK for Mesh (currently v.2.2.0), and looking at Generic OnOff instead of Simple OnOff.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards, &lt;br /&gt;Joakim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>