<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Current consumption in deep sleep differs betwwen s112 and s132</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39808/current-consumption-in-deep-sleep-differs-betwwen-s112-and-s132</link><description>I am experimenting with the Ebyte E73 module which is just a nRF52832 chip combined with capacitors, resistors and xtals. I also have the J-Link lite cortexM programmer. 
 Both examples below will build and run but the s132 example consumes ten times</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:56:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39808/current-consumption-in-deep-sleep-differs-betwwen-s112-and-s132" /><item><title>RE: Current consumption in deep sleep differs betwwen s112 and s132</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/154418?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2018 08:56:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ea5df5f9-5e19-4892-8e1b-03ad03839a5b</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You should get about 0.5 mA with both examples, as both have UART logging enabled by default. You can reduce the current consumption down to about 2&amp;nbsp;μA if you disable logging by setting NRF_LOG_ENABLED to 0 in the projects sdk_config.h file.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>