<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>How to reduce the free rtos power consumption in idle mode?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39961/how-to-reduce-the-free-rtos-power-consumption-in-idle-mode</link><description>Hi Sir, 
 
 As reference below link, and we can find the Tickless IDLE enabled ~700uA in SDK 15.2 
 https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/24733/nrf52840-sdk-14-0-0-and-tickless-idle-freertos---some-suggestions 
 
 1. Does the ~700 uA is the lowest</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 17:10:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39961/how-to-reduce-the-free-rtos-power-consumption-in-idle-mode" /><item><title>RE: How to reduce the free rtos power consumption in idle mode?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/155636?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 17:10:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:bb298fdd-b372-4336-93c7-01e0f418e531</guid><dc:creator>Susheel Nuguru</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;commenting out vTaskStartScheduler will make the system do nothing as the RTOS kernel will not start until you call this function. You should uncomment it and do a fix mentioned in &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/39459/observer-under-freertos-events-stop-coming-after-a-few-minutes"&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;thread in my reply marked in green.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that example, the tickless idle mode is already enable so you do not need to do anything else apart from applying the patch i mentioned in the link and uncommenting&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;vTaskStartScheduler&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to reduce the free rtos power consumption in idle mode?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/155476?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 07:48:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:fdc07391-1925-4722-9abf-6efdb505544c</guid><dc:creator>Hsu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Susheel,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If I want to test w/ &amp;quot;SDK_15.0.0\examples\ble_peripheral\ble_app_hrs_freertos&amp;quot;, how do I modify the code to make the system run in idle mode and see the 700uA idle power consumption?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;is it correct to comment the function &amp;quot;vTaskStartScheduler()&amp;quot;? when commented, I saw ~70 uA, but I&amp;#39;m not sure it works in idle mode.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BRs, Han&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: How to reduce the free rtos power consumption in idle mode?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/155033?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:03:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b39af1bf-ba3a-4882-b862-44dda97947b7</guid><dc:creator>Susheel Nuguru</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]1. Does the ~700 uA is the lowest idle current?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;With the advertising/connection parameters, it is the lowest you can see. But ofcourse you can reduce it more by increasing the adv/conn interval.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]2. from devzone, some discussion can reduce the idle current below 100 uA, any suggestion we can reach this target?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Like I said above, the consumption int he examples we gave depends very much on the adv/connection interval. These values are very close to the one examples which behave the same but without the RTOS. So the RTOS overhead power consumption is not big.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>