<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF51422 vs BT4.0, BT4.2 issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/40091/nrf51422-vs-bt4-0-bt4-2-issue</link><description>Hi 
 About this link : https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/b/blog/posts/what-impact-does-the-deprecation-and-withdrawal-of-bluetooth-core-specification-v4-0-and-v4-1-have-on-your-current-and-future-products , many customer still want to nRF51422 with s310</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:00:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/40091/nrf51422-vs-bt4-0-bt4-2-issue" /><item><title>RE: nRF51422 vs BT4.0, BT4.2 issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/157108?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:00:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:350cd6a6-808b-4de8-8d65-7f4b39744cf0</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi again,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not getting any feedback on this. I guess it is not decided yet. Most likely will depend on the customer demand vs the amount of work needed to support this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF51422 vs BT4.0, BT4.2 issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/155958?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:03:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:cb176ce2-487e-472c-b737-3dea5d7e61b9</guid><dc:creator>run_ar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Atlas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We will still have ant support for this chip with S210. Still waiting for feedback on whether we will redo the qualification for S310 or not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Br, Runar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>