<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NRF52840 Poor Radio performance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/40695/nrf52840-poor-radio-performance</link><description>Hi, 
 It&amp;#39;s my first design with nRF52840 (I have make multiple design with nRF51 et nRF52 without problem). 
 I use SDK15.2 and BLE_peripheral_blinky example without modification. 
 See schematic: 
 
 C14, C13: 1pF L1: 3.9nH L2: 3.3nH L3: 1.5nH 
 I have</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:50:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/40695/nrf52840-poor-radio-performance" /><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Poor Radio performance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/158221?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:50:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7b2d0835-a12f-4d38-ad40-d62bfe886b27</guid><dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bottom layer looks fine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Soldering a wire on will likely not be the correct length and it will not be matched (missing a shunt cap). Regardless, you are welcome do sent me one of your boards to optimize the output power, match the antenna.&amp;nbsp;We offer to do this for all our customers, just let me know if you are interested. If there actually &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; a problem with the nRF52840 I willalso work that out.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Poor Radio performance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/158210?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:19:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3c0cf6ab-7062-4426-9830-3889b039f0bc</guid><dc:creator>Ga&amp;#233;tan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andreas,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My board is composed by only 2 layers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/2161.PCB.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I need to precise, that I think there is a problem with generated power on nRF52840...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because, when I try with the first Pi filter like nRF52840DK and a wire, the RSSI is very low (about -85dBm) compared with nRF52840DK (-40dBm) at the same distance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ga&amp;eacute;tan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52840 Poor Radio performance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/158154?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:52:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d34f5136-9b3f-430b-9847-493a3a2a4073</guid><dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The board thickness is not too important and not specified to be 0.8mm, if anything it is specified to be 1.6mm but as I said it is not that important.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Without having seen your internal/bottom layer, I am quite certain this has to do with your antenna. L2 =3.3nH and L3=1.5nH are valid for the Johanson test board, in a different board they will be different. See &lt;a href="http://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.whitepapers/dita/whitepapers/pdflinks/nwp_017.html?cp=11_11"&gt;this whitepaper&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obviously, if you e.g. do not have ground underneath, or if you have ground underneath the antenna, that will also contribute negatively. If you share your other layers also I might be able to say something.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;C14 = C13 = 1.0pF and L1 = 3.9 nH are possibly not optimal for your design, but should not have an effect this large.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>