Using nRF Logger in SDK13 vs SDK 12.https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/40852/using-nrf-logger-in-sdk13-vs-sdk-12Hi, I&#39;m trying to migrate a prosjekt in SDK 12.0.0 to SDK 13.0.0 and having trouble with the NRF_LOG_RAW_INFO. Getting a warning = implicit declaration of function &#39;LOG_INTERNAL_9&#39;. From what i&#39;ve read in the forums, the nRF logger supports 0 to 6en-USTelligent Community 13Fri, 23 Nov 2018 22:03:21 GMTRE: Using nRF Logger in SDK13 vs SDK 12.https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/158898?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 23 Nov 2018 22:03:21 GMT137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0d0e0fdd-b776-4902-b916-5dce9a719be3Rafaelig<p>Ahh, okay. Thanks for the quick reply.&nbsp;<span class="emoticon" data-url="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/emoji/1f60a.svg" title="Blush">&#x1f60a;</span></p> <p></p> <p></p><div style="clear:both;"></div>RE: Using nRF Logger in SDK13 vs SDK 12.https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/158897?ContentTypeID=1Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:41:43 GMT137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:157d2a09-7ae1-4447-983f-3dd03adc5433Turbo J<p>The NRF_LOG_FLOAT_MARKER uses only 2 arguments in SDK12, but does not correctly print the minus sign if the value is between -1.0 and 0.0f - this bug was fixed with the 3-argument NRF_LOG_FLOAT_MARKER in later SDKs.</p><div style="clear:both;"></div>