<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Alternative to BLE Mesh - a star topology?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41260/alternative-to-ble-mesh---a-star-topology</link><description>While visiting the Nordic Tech Tour we were discussing the pros and cons of BLE Mesh with a Nordic employee. He recommended that we also looked at a different solution, a proprietary(?) BLE star protocol. Since we did not have much time to discuss it</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 12:15:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41260/alternative-to-ble-mesh---a-star-topology" /><item><title>RE: Alternative to BLE Mesh - a star topology?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/160562?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 12:15:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4ba45d76-96fd-4af8-95a3-ea05850c193f</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the S140 SoftDevice running on the nRF52840 you are able to run 20 concurrent BLE connections. That means that the nRF52840 can have e.g. 10&amp;nbsp;peripherals connections and 10 central connections at the same time, or 1 central connection and 19&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;peripherals&amp;nbsp;connections. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;#39;s not a&amp;nbsp;proprietary&amp;nbsp;protocol, it&amp;#39;s still BLE. How the decives should connect to each other is up to you, so you can configure the&amp;nbsp;topology as you want.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;We have a Youtube video illustrating&amp;nbsp;this &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbl6Dui-_w4"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Alternative to BLE Mesh - a star topology?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/160425?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2018 14:54:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:177d1218-de8f-4ca8-9a48-5bc704435c83</guid><dc:creator>awneil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Was the person actually referring to an existing product, or just suggesting that you develop something proprietary yourself?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does it have to be BLE?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;nRF52840 also supports IEEE 802.15.4 - there are many things based on that ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Or you can go entirely proprietary ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;There&amp;#39;s also&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://github.com/NordicPlayground/nRF51-ble-bcast-mesh"&gt;https://github.com/NordicPlayground/nRF51-ble-bcast-mesh&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- which, I think, was a proprietary BLE mesh before the SIG released its formal BLE Mesh standard.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>