<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Change nRF51DK BLE RX frequency channel (BLE sniffer)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41483/change-nrf51dk-ble-rx-frequency-channel-ble-sniffer</link><description>Hello, I&amp;#39;m currently using the nRF51DK with Wireshark as a BLE advertisement sniffer. So far this setup has worked great, but I&amp;#39;d like to make a small modification for development/evaluation purposes. I want to get an accurate sense of the packet error</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:28:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41483/change-nrf51dk-ble-rx-frequency-channel-ble-sniffer" /><item><title>RE: Change nRF51DK BLE RX frequency channel (BLE sniffer)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/161461?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 13:28:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:baabd613-2948-430a-b277-fa2d57cc5997</guid><dc:creator>AndreasF</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]&lt;strong&gt;Question:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;Is it possible for me to change the receive frequency of nRF51DK and still use the BLE sniffer code with Wireshark?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m unsure if this will work, we don&amp;#39;t have any support for our Python implementations. CH39 advertises at 2.480 GHz, I don’t think you can make it advertise at 2.483 GHz since that is out of BLE spec.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What i would recommend you to do if you want to avoid interference is either test at a remote location where you don&amp;#39;t have interference from BLE/WiFi, or use a radio chamber, or find an old microwave oven which you drill a hole in to plug the USB cables inside. Microwaves have good interference reduction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note also that the nRF51 does work perfect as a BLE Sniffer, it is reasonable. The nRF51 also turns off and on the radio in order to recalibrate the crystal, so this should also be taken into account.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I would recommend that you use a professional BLE Sniffer, for example the Ellisys Bluetooth Explorer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>