<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Xcode invalidate the ble app because of UDID is used somewhere in the code</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/4149/xcode-invalidate-the-ble-app-because-of-udid-is-used-somewhere-in-the-code</link><description>I used nRF_Demo_Utility ios app and WFConnector.framework in a sample testing app im building. And when I tried to archive it using xcode it invalidates it with a error message about UDID (apps are not permitted to access the udid and must not use the</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 01:05:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/4149/xcode-invalidate-the-ble-app-because-of-udid-is-used-somewhere-in-the-code" /><item><title>RE: Xcode invalidate the ble app because of UDID is used somewhere in the code</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/14840?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 01:05:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e2fed9ac-3ae4-4630-abda-434fb147eb8e</guid><dc:creator>RK</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not really a Nordic question at all. Apple deprecated the use of UDID back in iOS5 and since iOS7 disallowed apps from using it completely. There&amp;#39;s plenty of documentation on the Apple site about the proper way to get device identifiers depending on what exactly you&amp;#39;re trying to do. identifierForVendor is the most direct replacement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it&amp;#39;s in your code, change it, if it&amp;#39;s in WFConnector (whatever that is) get a newer version from wherever you downloaded that from (5 seconds on google tells me the author removed that call in V 3.0 which was ages ago).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>