Configuring an offset for sd_temp_get() - how?

RE: Configuring an offset for sd_temp_get() - how?

Bjørn Kvaale — Thu, 03 Jan 2019 14:14:14 GMT

It could maybe be related to caching. Let us know what you find out!

RE: Configuring an offset for sd_temp_get() - how?

NordicHam — Thu, 03 Jan 2019 06:25:07 GMT

HNY to all!

@awneil, thank you for the heads-up.

@Bjorn, I am able to configure an offset in the code, but have not yet figured out why the offset does not seem to be consistently applied after a full make. I will be updating a few more SoC's this week and will try to recreate the issue. Maybe its related to caching inside Android nRF Connect app, as seemingly inferred in another post here.

Regards
Jacques

RE: Configuring an offset for sd_temp_get() - how?

awneil — Sun, 30 Dec 2018 11:16:37 GMT

How to properly post source code:

RE: Configuring an offset for sd_temp_get() - how?

Bjørn Kvaale — Sat, 29 Dec 2018 18:58:36 GMT

Hi Jacques,

Is this still an issue or have you found a solution?

Regards,

Bjorn

RE: Configuring an offset for sd_temp_get() - how?

NordicHam — Wed, 19 Dec 2018 14:31:10 GMT

I implemented this change in Eddystone example in SDK 15.2.0 with my nRF52-DK, and the temperature in the frame was decreased as expected.

However I struggled to roll back the change - only recompiling es_tlm.c and re-linking it could have been the cause.

I did a full erase of the nRF51822 and then full recompile and link, before coding the SoC. Afterwards the change took effect and the temperature in the frame was as expected, 6.5 degrees below the die temperature.

I will try to recreate the issue whereby it seems the change in es_tlm.c is not consistently included in the recompiled code.

Regards

Jacques