<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>structure the nRF5 SDK use Kconfig</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41917/structure-the-nrf5-sdk-use-kconfig</link><description>nRF5 SDK structure project use makefile and sdk_config.h header file, When I want to add a component to my project. There is too hard work to modify the makefile and sdk_config.h file. Why not structure the nRF5 SDK use Kconfig like linux? by the way</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:51:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41917/structure-the-nrf5-sdk-use-kconfig" /><item><title>RE: structure the nRF5 SDK use Kconfig</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/163814?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 15:51:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d2597d90-5582-4e9d-8c00-4ee021a91346</guid><dc:creator>Marjeris Romero</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Sean,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I forwarded your suggestion to the SDK team and I got the following answer:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Thanks for a good suggestion. We are aware of the advantages of Kconfig and we are using this in our new Zephyr RTOS based SDK which is under development &lt;a href="https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/0.3.0/nrf/index.html"&gt;https://developer.nordicsemi.com/nRF_Connect_SDK/doc/0.3.0/nrf/index.html&lt;/a&gt; . This SDK is still not very mature, and the BLE support there is limited and not something we would recommend for developing actual products at this time. However our experience with Kconfig and CMake instead of the sdk_config.h and makefiles is very positive. We can&amp;#39;t promisse anything, but it&amp;#39;s a technology we have positive experience with and will keep in mind going forwards in our SDK development.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marjeris&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: structure the nRF5 SDK use Kconfig</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/163153?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2018 10:26:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c46d6a1a-695e-4731-bd2d-dd4370da693e</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear customer,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to limited staff during the holiday period, we unfortunately can&amp;#39;t&amp;nbsp;handle your case before we get back to the&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;normal&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;staff by the first week of January 2019. We are sorry indeed for the delay. We wish you a great holiday and a Happy New Year 2019.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best Regards,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nordic&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;Tech&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;Support&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;Team&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>