<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Trouble analysing Mesh test results.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41940/trouble-analysing-mesh-test-results</link><description>Hi all, 
 I&amp;#39;m currently testing my Mesh network on a small scale. I&amp;#39;m sending messages every 25ms with different TTL values in an environment as visualised below. 
 
 The bar chart below shows the results for the tests for different TTL values. 
 
 
</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:30:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/41940/trouble-analysing-mesh-test-results" /><item><title>RE: Trouble analysing Mesh test results.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/163964?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 13:30:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5a3de7c0-9fca-4413-81f9-d7976de08085</guid><dc:creator>Bj&amp;#248;rn Kvaale</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s a good question. You are correct that messages with a TTL of 0 or 1 do not get relayed (network.c, mesh sdk v3.0.0):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/support-attachments/beef5d1b77644c448dabff31668f3a47-2191da9c152b4c3292350403c9bdd3c7/pastedimage1546608238515v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What kind of unicast messages are you sending? Are you using&amp;nbsp;generic_onoff_client_set_unack() or&amp;nbsp;generic_onoff_client_set()?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What retransmit count have you chosen for these connections? The standard one? I guess this count has remained constant throughout, correct?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How big is the payload you are sending? Can everything fit in a 11 byte packet?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, have you set this network up with the nRF Mesh application? Which mesh sdk version are you currently using?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Trouble analysing Mesh test results.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/163492?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 14:52:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:570ce8ff-7d9c-4751-aed3-8ec51f558cac</guid><dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Bj&lt;span&gt;&amp;oslash;&lt;/span&gt;rn,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yes, the purple value is the average of both connections. Between node 0 and 2 was approx. 4 meters and 16 meters between node 1 and 3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do understand why the percentage goes up for Time to Live (TTL) values 2 and 3.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, I don&amp;#39;t understand why there is a difference between TTL 0 and TTL 1 for the &amp;quot;0 to 2&amp;quot; connection. Is there an explanation for this? Is there possibly a difference between receiving or sending a message with a TTL of 0 or 1?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jan&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Trouble analysing Mesh test results.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/163484?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 14:34:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:840ab76a-e088-42d7-a640-e729717ee216</guid><dc:creator>Bj&amp;#248;rn Kvaale</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jan,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is the total purple value the average between Node 0-&amp;gt;2 &amp;amp; node 1-&amp;gt;3? How far apart are nodes 0 &amp;amp; 2 &amp;amp; nodes 1 &amp;amp; 3? Could it be that node 0 is relaying some of the unicast messages via 1 or 3 to node 2 (hence the better results for TTL 2 &amp;amp; 3). It seems that there is a wall between nodes 0 &amp;amp; 2, so this may explain the better results (no wall between nodes 1-&amp;gt;2 &amp;amp; 3-&amp;gt;2).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>