<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rev 3 QFAA devices and ST Balun</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/4244/rev-3-qfaa-devices-and-st-balun</link><description>I see from the 51822 PAN sheet v3.0 that item 61 still shows Rev 3 QFAA package devices as potentially having problems with LO leakage. We are in production with R2 QFAAG0 devices now using the updated ST balun that is designed for the G0 parts. Are there</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:40:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/4244/rev-3-qfaa-devices-and-st-balun" /><item><title>RE: Rev 3 QFAA devices and ST Balun</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/15160?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 02:40:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:dbeec247-6f4c-4aca-9273-b64c8e252322</guid><dc:creator>Locky</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Not to hijak, but does this issue also extend to the ST BALF-NRF01D3 as well?   That may be a component swap fix for you if it doesn&amp;#39;t, as these parts have the same footprint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>