<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>2 Servers 1 client data synchronization (nrf52832)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/43436/2-servers-1-client-data-synchronization-nrf52832</link><description>Hello, 
 I’m using two nrf52832 as servers sending 20 Byte data with 18 ms notification interval. 
 Notification Data: 
 [incremented uint8_t ] [19 byte data] 
 
 Client: 
 I recognized, that the softdevice is processing multiple Datapackages from one</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:44:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/43436/2-servers-1-client-data-synchronization-nrf52832" /><item><title>RE: 2 Servers 1 client data synchronization (nrf52832)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/171063?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:44:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5dd449f4-823a-43cb-9da0-7f0bfb569653</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd</dc:creator><description>[quote userid="75696" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/43436/2-servers-1-client-data-synchronization-nrf52832/170485"]Increasing the buffer is only delaying the overfill of one buffer. [/quote]
&lt;p&gt;So one device is always sending more data than the other device.&lt;/p&gt;
[quote userid="75696" url="~/f/nordic-q-a/43436/2-servers-1-client-data-synchronization-nrf52832/170485"]Using indication could be one solution, but will decrease my datarate[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;If the decrease in datarate is not&amp;nbsp;acceptable, you could implement your own logic where you turn off the&amp;nbsp;notification when your sync-buffer is full.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: 2 Servers 1 client data synchronization (nrf52832)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/170485?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:56:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ba47e958-fbcf-45fb-96af-fc085ea956d8</guid><dc:creator>stackGreen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Increasing the buffer is only delaying the overfill of one buffer. Using indication could be one solution, but will decrease my datarate ... I will give it a try.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you so far.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: 2 Servers 1 client data synchronization (nrf52832)</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/170173?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:27:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c2d8b24f-49cd-4b9c-b194-7afbeeda2992</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How about increasing the buffer size? Or&amp;nbsp;depending on&amp;nbsp;throughput requirements, use indication instead, so that you need to do application layer ack before you&amp;nbsp;receive the next package.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>