<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wireless RTC synchronization</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/43933/wireless-rtc-synchronization</link><description>Hello, 
 
 Following this post , you provide a mechanism to synchronize RTC or Timer between 2 nRF52. the available code allows a Timer synchronization, but in our case, we have to synchronize RTC. 
 
 So, is there any examples that synchronize RTC? </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:49:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/43933/wireless-rtc-synchronization" /><item><title>RE: Wireless RTC synchronization</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/172133?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:49:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:54a4c218-7f21-43bb-99cc-ccb9cc5de2fe</guid><dc:creator>Einar Thorsrud</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no practical difference between synchronizing the RTC or timer. The blog and example project describe how you can exchange packets with a low and predictable latency, and it doesn&amp;#39;t really matter whether you synchronize the RTC or timer. In any case it is just a matter of getting the packets over with as low latency as possible, and then calculating the RTC offset).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>