nRF51422 issues with 2nd harmonic FCC testing

RE: nRF51422 issues with 2nd harmonic FCC testing

Danny — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:13:31 GMT

Any feedback will be greatly appreciated.

RE: nRF51422 issues with 2nd harmonic FCC testing

Danny — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:46:10 GMT

To pass FCC testing with the original design, what should we have tweaked? Or would that have depended on the measure impedance looking back at the radio? I looked for a guide to tweak the circuit from nordic semiconductor but didn't see or find anything to this exact circuit. The closest I could find was the white paper mentined above.

RE: nRF51422 issues with 2nd harmonic FCC testing

Asbjørn — Mon, 24 Nov 2014 14:11:38 GMT

To a certain extend we don't have any issues with customers doing tuning like this and following the "if it works and passes, it works and passes"-philosophy.

To give you some better understand of the components. There's no pi-filter for the antenna in the schematic you have attached originally. All the components from C28 to C58 are there to handle the output of the radio and make sure the output is filtered and converted into a 50 Ohm single ended output. So at C58/L1 is where you have the 50 Ohm point. So the components you have changed is not intended to be used for tuning the antenna, but you can tune what is delivered to the antenna. If I saw this schematic without you telling me that you have passed I would never have recommended doing what you have done, as I would expect you to run into issues with other harmonics or spurious due to the 0 Ohm resistors you have replaced some of the components with. There's nothing wrong with the operation of the radio, it would just be a regulatory issue, but since you have passed everything would be ok from Nordics point of view too.

Just to be on the safe side here, what you have done works for your application. We still recommend customers to follow Nordics reference layout and schematic closely.

RE: nRF51422 issues with 2nd harmonic FCC testing

Danny — Fri, 21 Nov 2014 22:04:12 GMT

We ended up passing EMI testing with this circuit:

What makes me nervous is that we removed C26 with a zero ohm. Our performance was 10dB higher than the previous circuit and we passed all harmonics.

Is there something that I should be concerned about. We can reliably transmit and receive data in this configuration and we are passing EMC testing. I guess when it works, it works but I can't help but think we should be doing something different.