PCA10056 vs. PCA10056e

RE: PCA10056 vs. PCA10056e

brec — Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:37:07 GMT

In general we indicate that the PCA10056e examples should be used where present. If one does not exist, then use PCA10056, keeping memory and peripheral limitations in mind.

RE: PCA10056 vs. PCA10056e

hmolesworth — Sat, 12 Oct 2019 18:33:40 GMT

I am testing with a Rigado BMD-360, which is a dedicated nRF52811 development board. Before I trawl through the needed changes to (say) pca10056 do you know if this has been done already? I didn't see pca10056e definition header .. the define DEVELOP_IN_NRF52840 only seems to apply to the Reset pin and some errata, not the peripheral differences

RE: PCA10056 vs. PCA10056e

Øyvind — Thu, 04 Apr 2019 08:13:31 GMT

Hello,

PCA10056 is the dedicated development kit for the nRF52840, while the PCA10056e is the emulated version of nRF52811 to be used on the nRF52840 DK. A dedicated development kit for nRF52811 is not available, but the nRF SDK provides you with emulated projects, located in the 'pca10056e' folder More information here.

Best regards,
Øyvind