<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bluetooth SIG Declaration and ETSI/FCC</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/46664/bluetooth-sig-declaration-and-etsi-fcc</link><description>Hi, 
 we are about to enter bluetooth and expand our products with it. however, the approval process still raises some questions. What I have understood so far (please correct if I am wrong) is that at the end a qualification and a declaration must be</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:12:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/46664/bluetooth-sig-declaration-and-etsi-fcc" /><item><title>RE: Bluetooth SIG Declaration and ETSI/FCC</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/184299?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:12:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6160c10b-b7ca-42ab-ae7b-732a7edd17a3</guid><dc:creator>Tom Fesenmeyer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for answering all questions, things are clearer now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Greetings&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tom&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Bluetooth SIG Declaration and ETSI/FCC</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/184113?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b0e71ce0-869a-465b-bf0e-77b950891997</guid><dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. I believe you just refer to that ID, yes. You might want to run it by the module producer though as we really have little experience with qualifying their products.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. If you follow our reference design closely you can list your product and refer to our end-product QDID. We still recommend that you test the RF-PHY to have your back covered. No need to re-qualify, just test and save the logs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Not exactly, we can test the RF performance of your design and suggest any BOM/PCB changes needed and tune your antenna. This to make sure that when you apply for regulatory certification (FCC/ETSI) your design is optimized for best possible performance and is compliant with regards to harmonic and spurious emissions, meaning you should not run any risk of failing the certification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Only if you otherwise would have failed the certification, meaning you would need to make changes to your design and reapply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. In practice no, we can not make any changes to the module.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. Unless you get a &amp;#39;volume discount&amp;#39; at the test house: no, these are different tests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Andreas&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>