<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>LFCLKSRC crystal PPM accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/4686/lfclksrc-crystal-ppm-accuracy</link><description>Our application includes a 32.768 kHz crystal oscillator with a nominal +/- 20 PPM accuracy. When I factor in aging over 10 years and worst case variation due to temperature it could theoretically get to -250 PPM. 
 There are a variety of enumerated</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:37:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/4686/lfclksrc-crystal-ppm-accuracy" /><item><title>RE: LFCLKSRC crystal PPM accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/16617?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2014 00:37:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b27ad920-f6b1-49f8-b3e5-b072a8aef445</guid><dc:creator>Matt Barr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the answer Stefan, I appreciate the information on PPM requirements.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: LFCLKSRC crystal PPM accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/16616?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 14:14:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:eb769e00-52a2-4023-b51b-cd1a81ba6ddc</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Birnir Sverrisson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BLE requires 500 ppm in order to be within specification and in order to work. You should sum up all of the accuracy parameters of the crystal to get the total ppm accuracy. If nominal ppm, temperature variation and aging add up to worst case 500ppm or less, that is sufficient for BLE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ANT has 50ppm reqirement so if you intend to use ANT as well, you should have a higher accuracy crystal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: LFCLKSRC crystal PPM accuracy</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/16615?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:58:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a54f0b4b-194b-4f36-9009-8eee69d8862b</guid><dc:creator>Matt Barr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I notice that nRF51-DK projects typically use 20 PPM:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT(NRF_CLOCK_LFCLKSRC_XTAL_20_PPM, false);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ant examples use 50 PPM:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;err_code = sd_softdevice_enable(NRF_CLOCK_LFCLKSRC_XTAL_50_PPM, softdevice_assert_callback);&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>