<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Why use sd_ecb_block_encrypt() vs nrf_ecb_crypt()?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/46870/why-use-sd_ecb_block_encrypt-vs-nrf_ecb_crypt</link><description>There are two APIs in SDK 14.2 to access the nrf52832&amp;#39;s AES core. What&amp;#39;s the difference in behavior between the two? 
 I noticed that nrf_ecb_crypt() has a useful return value and sd_ecb_block_encrypt() does not. Does this mean that sd_ecb_block_encrypt</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 18:45:20 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/46870/why-use-sd_ecb_block_encrypt-vs-nrf_ecb_crypt" /><item><title>RE: Why use sd_ecb_block_encrypt() vs nrf_ecb_crypt()?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/185570?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 18:45:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:ea8a09eb-190a-4163-80d2-c63e07f37de9</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Because it will not fail.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why use sd_ecb_block_encrypt() vs nrf_ecb_crypt()?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/185561?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 17:11:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7f658a7a-51a5-482b-9fdd-7904a49a3ffc</guid><dc:creator>Elias</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, this does clarify things. Why does &lt;span&gt;sd_ecb_block_encrypt&lt;/span&gt;() only have a &amp;quot;success&amp;quot; return value?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Why use sd_ecb_block_encrypt() vs nrf_ecb_crypt()?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/185385?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 09:06:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:91dd3aad-f95b-42f9-82d8-9103fe05d398</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, there are two api calls depending on whether the softdevice is enabled or not:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sds_s132/SDS/s1xx/sd_resource_reqs/hw_block_interrupt_vector.html"&gt;https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sds_s132/SDS/s1xx/sd_resource_reqs/hw_block_interrupt_vector.html&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The implementation in the softdevice api call should in general provide the same functionality as if the application have direct access, but the return code and actual implementation may differ.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>