<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/48041/spis-consumption</link><description>Hello, 
 We are using the SPIS on the nRF52832. We are seeing a higher than expected consumption when it&amp;#39;s enabled and not used. 
 I measure around 7uA extra when enabling, which goes away if I disable it. 
 The ports are properly driven from the master</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:06:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/48041/spis-consumption" /><item><title>RE: SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192897?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:06:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:eec304e6-9401-4439-9b1b-52dfc5f12903</guid><dc:creator>Stian R&amp;#248;ed Hafskjold</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, but it&amp;#39;s a symptom of this errata: &lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Ferrata_nRF52832_Rev2%2FERR%2FnRF52832%2FRev2%2Flatest%2Fanomaly_832_97.html&amp;amp;anchor=anomaly_832_97"&gt;https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Ferrata_nRF52832_Rev2%2FERR%2FnRF52832%2FRev2%2Flatest%2Fanomaly_832_97.html&amp;amp;anchor=anomaly_832_97&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can use SPIS as intended, but then you need to accept the additional ~6uA. If that&amp;#39;s unacceptable, you can try to use the PORT event instead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So yes, trigger on PORT event with the CSN line, then enable SPIS, and disable it after it&amp;#39;s done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192749?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:34:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8bd2900e-d1b5-4880-80b5-34d3b7376047</guid><dc:creator>agusuyu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So I can&amp;#39;t leave the SPIS enabled and use the interrupt? That&amp;#39;s basically not using it as intended.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;d need a PORT event, then enable SPIS and wait for its interrupt, and then disable it.&amp;nbsp; Is that it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From&amp;nbsp;the spec GPIOTE shouldn&amp;#39;t draw that much current, or should it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192731?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:38:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:a5036135-d123-4a6d-aed1-19a35908b00d</guid><dc:creator>Stian R&amp;#248;ed Hafskjold</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, When the SPIS is waiting for an interrupt in the CS pin, the power consumption is similar to the GPIOTE IN event. You can try to trigger on the GPIOTE PORT event instead, and enable the slave in the interrupt handler.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192387?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:59:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:29bd3eed-7c4a-4b67-8d16-143611587bda</guid><dc:creator>agusuyu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone see the same thing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My latest test was to check if it&amp;#39;s the &amp;quot;interrupt&amp;quot; on CS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying with the example pin_change_int and I get the same current consumption. Could this be it? Even though according to the spec it should be &amp;lt;1uA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192168?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:39:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b91ca9ab-c3d6-401a-9c0c-08e1734f63b9</guid><dc:creator>agusuyu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone see the same thing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My latest test was to check if it&amp;#39;s the &amp;quot;interrupt&amp;quot; on CS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m trying with the example pin_change_int and I get the same current consumption. Could this be it? Even though according to the spec it should be &amp;lt;1uA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/191712?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 17:40:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c68e958b-5206-4662-8365-65f88e3aeb89</guid><dc:creator>agusuyu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In trying to figure out what&amp;#39;s happening I switched from SPIS to SPIM and I don&amp;#39;t have the extra 7uA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All measurements from a DK (PCA10040) give exact same results&amp;nbsp;using SDK examples (without CONSTLAT).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can&amp;#39;t find anything that would explain this other than it&amp;#39;s just what it draws and the 1uA from the spec is wrong. Could that be the case?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: SPIS consumption</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/190619?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 19:50:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d359c61d-a38b-4748-881e-d9c53d2a9100</guid><dc:creator>agusuyu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m attaching images of current measurement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first one is with SPI Disabled, the second Enabled. The difference is ~7uA.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1559591151853v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1559591396847v6.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>