<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Central Connection Interval Schedule &amp;amp; Latency Issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/48398/central-connection-interval-schedule-latency-issue</link><description>I am trying to solve a latency issue. My system consists of a central and 20 connected peripherals (all based on Nordic parts). I have allocated the following: 
 Scan Interval: 200ms Scan Window: 5ms Connection Interval Min/Max: 55ms Gap Event Length</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:35:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/48398/central-connection-interval-schedule-latency-issue" /><item><title>RE: Central Connection Interval Schedule &amp; Latency Issue</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192071?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:35:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:47f3f9e6-6ef2-4ca4-b669-3cd331c74e3c</guid><dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the configured tolerance and source of the LFCK used here (on peripherals and central)? Any improvement if configure 500ppm?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To avoid scanning take precedence over active links, try to scan as often as possible, e.g. interval 10ms and window 5ms.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also check out:&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sds_s132/SDS/s1xx/multilink_scheduling/suggested_intervals_windows_s132.html?cp=3_4_1_0_14_9"&gt;https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sds_s132/SDS/s1xx/multilink_scheduling/suggested_intervals_windows_s132.html?cp=3_4_1_0_14_9&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span&gt;The probability of collision can be reduced (though not eliminated) if the central role link parameters are set as suggested in this section, and the following rules are applied for all roles:&lt;/span&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think you need to have a larger interval than 55ms here, e.g. 60ms due to tScanReserved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Kenneth&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>