<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Max back to back Notifications within a single Connection interval</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/48509/max-back-to-back-notifications-within-a-single-connection-interval</link><description>Hello, 
 
 I am using nRF52832, SDK_15.3.0, S132 SoftDevice and Segger for flashing the image. I am using ‘ble_app_blinky’ and “nRF Connect” app. 
 
 I am trying to understand back to back notifications within Connection interval. 
 
 1) What does “NRF_SDH_BLE_GAP_EVENT_LENGTH</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:37:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/48509/max-back-to-back-notifications-within-a-single-connection-interval" /><item><title>RE: Max back to back Notifications within a single Connection interval</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192750?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:37:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:606b0d71-8404-4cf3-bd78-c1409974b39e</guid><dc:creator>beemavishnu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;for your inputs&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Max back to back Notifications within a single Connection interval</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/192600?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 09:04:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b2b9ce63-2f03-4ae5-9266-8b005e296442</guid><dc:creator>Sigurd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Yes, you can increase the event length to 75 ms. This will increase the achievable&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;throughput&amp;nbsp;for the link.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) This will not cause any issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) You don&amp;#39;t need to change &lt;span&gt;BLE_GATTS_HVN_TX_QUEUE_SIZE_DEFAULT or use&amp;nbsp;sd_ble_cfg_set. The&amp;nbsp;hvn_tx_queue_size will be&amp;nbsp;indirectly&amp;nbsp;configured based on&amp;nbsp;NRF_SDH_BLE_GAP_DATA_LENGTH&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;NRF_SDH_BLE_GAP_EVENT_LENGTH values.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;4) Yes, as long as&amp;nbsp;sd_ble_gatts_hvx() returns&amp;nbsp;NRF_SUCCESS, and you don&amp;#39;t disconnect the link, the packet will be sent in the upcoming connection events.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>