Differential ADC Anomaly on nRF9160 DK

RE: Differential ADC Anomaly on nRF9160 DK

Håkon Alseth — Tue, 16 Jul 2019 07:44:05 GMT

Could you attach your configuration/sample so that I can try this at my end?

Kind regards,

Håkon

RE: Differential ADC Anomaly on nRF9160 DK

bencra — Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:54:36 GMT

Hi, that has reduced the error to ~25, which is not ideal but usable. I'm still seeing wild oscillations between samples. For example:

Sample 609: -335
Sample 610: 314
Sample 611: -333
Sample 612: 312
Sample 613: -336
Sample 614: 314
Sample 615: -337
Sample 616: 312
Sample 617: -338
Sample 618: 314
Sample 619: -337
Sample 620: 317
Sample 621: -340
Sample 622: 317
Sample 623: -336

No matter the sampling parameters, the samples alternate in this way. Is there a reason for this?

RE: Differential ADC Anomaly on nRF9160 DK

Håkon Alseth — Mon, 15 Jul 2019 12:10:18 GMT

Hi,

The UART1 interface occupies the P0.14 and P0.15 pins by default on the DK, as shown here: https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ug_nrf91_dk/UG/nrf91_DK/if_connector.html

Could you try to use AIN0 and AIN3 (https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/ps_nrf9160/pin.html?cp=2_0_0_9_0) instead and see if these give the expected result?

Kind regards,

Håkon

RE: Differential ADC Anomaly on nRF9160 DK

bencra — Sun, 14 Jul 2019 18:15:14 GMT

For grounded inputs, for any given sample set (extra_samplings set to 399 - total samples = 400), there seems to be large alternating errors, such as:

Sample 368: 415
Sample 369: 364
Sample 370: 416
Sample 371: 360
Sample 372: 414
Sample 373: 362
Sample 374: 415
Sample 375: 365
Sample 376: 417
Sample 377: 357
Sample 378: 416
Sample 379: 363
Sample 380: 418
Sample 381: 364

I'm also struggling to find documentation regarding the correct calibration procedure.

At current, I'm performing NRF_SAADC_NS->TASKS_CALIBRATEOFFSET = 1; before all sampling.

Update:

Considering the invalid result (errata) which comes from settting VDD_GPIO > 2.1V, I've changed the VDD_GPIO to 1.8V. The error in the samples now appears to have decreased, and the samples look something like this:

Sample 365: 209
Sample 366: 304
Sample 367: 211
Sample 368: 303
Sample 369: 213
Sample 370: 302
Sample 371: 213
Sample 372: 304
Sample 373: 213
Sample 374: 305
Sample 375: 210
Sample 376: 303
Sample 377: 212
Sample 378: 302
Sample 379: 213
Sample 380: 300

This is still not useful data for my use case.