<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Differential ADC source resistance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/49858/differential-adc-source-resistance</link><description>Hi all, 
 We are working on a project that requires us to measure the resistance of something applied externally. We are mainly interested in the change of resistance over time. It is possible to control the maximum resistance (default state) to some</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:42:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/49858/differential-adc-source-resistance" /><item><title>RE: Differential ADC source resistance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/199128?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 07:42:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:74c38331-5262-43ba-b2db-5a0e3ad21bfa</guid><dc:creator>WoutZenso</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you haakonsh for the suggestion though I think that this&amp;nbsp;might be a little overkill for our application. The change in resistance is quite significant, it is more like a switch principle (either it is open, or it is closed, but with high resistance). As far as I understand, Wheatstone bridges are excellent to see small changes in resistance with high accuracy. That is not really our concern. The extra cost of one resistor is so small that it won&amp;#39;t justify the additional design/testing time to get everything tuned perfectly (with contact resistance at the interface and so on).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Differential ADC source resistance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/198941?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2019 11:22:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8791bdf8-4650-4269-b8b3-8ea1e0fb4153</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;They both have their own sampling capacitors.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Btw, if you use a &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatstone_bridge"&gt;Wheatstone Bridge&lt;/a&gt; you can reduce your component count by one:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img alt=" " src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Wheatstonebridge.svg" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you keep R2 constant there will be a voltage differential between D and B that can be used to calculate Rx. R2 also sets the 0V point, where R2 = Rx.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Differential ADC source resistance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/198760?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:17:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b163249f-025e-4050-a163-662871327177</guid><dc:creator>WoutZenso</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank haakonsh for your fast reply! I am still a bit in the dark about how the differential ADC works internally. Should I see it as both the positive and negative input of the ADC having a sampling capacitor to the ground, or is there&amp;nbsp;just one sampling capacitor between both inputs? My calculation assumes the first approach, but if it is the second approach, I&amp;#39;m not entirely sure on how to estimate the source resistance. Would it still be the same?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Differential ADC source resistance</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/198681?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 11:24:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:39b8c8ba-8161-4238-b84f-2f13b17eba39</guid><dc:creator>haakonsh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The maximum source resistance limit is due to the sample-and-hold circuit, we need to charge the sampling capacitor before the Aquisition timer runs out and samples the capacitor. If the source resistance is too great the current flowing into the sampling capacitor will not be able to fully charge the capacitor before the voltage across it is sampled.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As long as the maximum source resistance is less than 800kohm you&amp;#39;re good, so your calculation of&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;150k+R+30k &amp;lt; 800kohm&lt;/span&gt; is correct. It does not matter how many inputs you have connected, they all got the same limit of 800kohm.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>