<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>High power consumption when starting external LFCLK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5018/high-power-consumption-when-starting-external-lfclk</link><description>Just starting the external LFCLK needs a considerable amount of energy. With my evaluation board it takes about 340ms for the XTAL to get started, which is well within the specifications. However, during all this time, the system draws about 820&amp;#181;A at</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:40:58 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5018/high-power-consumption-when-starting-external-lfclk" /><item><title>RE: High power consumption when starting external LFCLK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/17694?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:40:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:6bbd8ebd-db59-4440-95c8-63c091f01261</guid><dc:creator>Quax64</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Stefan, in response to your update of 27.1.2015 regarding the use of the RC:
Thank you for the suggestion which is definitely an alternative worth being further investigated. Going from 20ppm to 250ppm will increase radio up time though, but it might still pay off in my application.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: High power consumption when starting external LFCLK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/17693?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:52:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:083c956e-e8b5-458e-810e-16dbe5952dc7</guid><dc:creator>Quax64</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the response.
Whether it is a problem clearly depends on the application. In my application the system is in the SYSTEM ON mode for a relatively short period of time (some minutes) and all it does is reporting infrequent button press events. It is long enough to make it worthwhile starting the external LFCLK but short enough to make the power consumption for starting the clock a considerable factor.
This somewhat unexpectedly high power consumption won&amp;#39;t render the nRF51 completely unusable for my application and won&amp;#39;t matter too much for many other applications, I guess, but maybe it could be reduced in future releases of the chip. I also think that it should be mentioned in the Reference Guide or Product Specification.
Anyway, thanks for confirming that this cannot be avoided, so I just have to live with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: High power consumption when starting external LFCLK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/17692?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:07:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:16d3f70c-a555-4a86-8eb1-843d0e141b34</guid><dc:creator>Stefan Birnir Sverrisson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think there is nothing that can be configured to avoid this current consumption. It is automatically handled internally and can not be configured. Usually, you only draw this current once for each reset, so it should usually not be of that big concern.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update 27.1.2014&lt;/strong&gt;
There is also the possibility of using the internal LFCLK RC with the&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;NRF_CLOCK_LFCLKSRC_RC_250_PPM_TEMP_4000MS_CALIBRATION
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;p&gt;option , which will add 2-3 uA compared to a 20ppm crystal. I guess it depends on how frequently you need to start the crystal if it would pay off to use the RC instead, &lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/question/953/what-low-frequency-clock-sources-can-i-use/?answer=955#post-id-955"&gt;see this thread&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: High power consumption when starting external LFCLK</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/17691?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:40:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:37f0410c-e14d-4884-b112-98a6a6c944a2</guid><dc:creator>Quax64</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Any comments?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>