formatted documention for s120 v2.0?

RE: formatted documention for s120 v2.0?

pabigot — Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:43:58 GMT

Part of the problem may be that S110 1.0.1 is the only one marked as stable; SDK 7.2.0 came out after S110 v2.0.0 but still has S110 1.0.1 in it. I do think you should have API documentation for each released soft device version and make it available in a permanent location. Some of us do use the soft devices without using the rest of the SDK (except the CMSIS headers which don't change very often) and that would make it easier to know which SD version we're using (because SD version information is not obvious from SDK version information in the URL).

RE: formatted documention for s120 v2.0?

Petter Myhre — Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:38:08 GMT

Unfortunately, we don't have such documentation available. Usually, this is not a big issue, because the time between a SoftDevice release and the next SDK release is short.

I have reported this, and we will look into having a separate API documentation for the SoftDevices.

RE: formatted documention for s120 v2.0?

RK — Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:18:44 GMT

There's none I know of. I spent an afternoon messing around with doxygen trying to roll my own but I suspect there's more goes into the input for documentation than just the header files and didn't end up with a very good result.

What I'd love myself is if Nordic would build a 'docset', something which doxygen does support with a couple of command-line options although I expect it would take a little work to get a good one. That you could then read with any docset reader like Dash, search, link, bookmark.