<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Close-In Spurs - Problem or not?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5158/close-in-spurs---problem-or-not</link><description>Hello, 
 I&amp;#39;m seeing some 67.2kHz reference spurs on the RF signal when I&amp;#39;m turning on the constant carrier mode using the DTM interface on the nRF51822. Layout and circuit is very similiar to the reference design using the STM Balun. I&amp;#39;m seeing the spurs</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:21:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5158/close-in-spurs---problem-or-not" /><item><title>RE: Close-In Spurs - Problem or not?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18080?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:21:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7c9d73eb-df97-4e4a-bddc-2f57af7b2325</guid><dc:creator>michael</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Reinhard, since then I haven&amp;#39;t looked into this anymore. I could reduce the spurs by about 5dB by playing with bypass capacitors around the nRF51. The spurs did not seem to cause any problems with sensitivity or interferer testing and I was able to pass compliance testing without any problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Close-In Spurs - Problem or not?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18081?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:55:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e3ee69fe-091b-4531-89e7-459ceeeaec25</guid><dc:creator>Reinhard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you resolve the issue with the close-in spurs? I&amp;#39;m experiencing similar spur problems - in my case located 166.5 kHz, approx -25dBc. I also experienced same behaviour on custom hardware as well as on PCA10001 evaluation board (battery supplied).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Close-In Spurs - Problem or not?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18078?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:25:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3bdc58a0-bcdf-47fd-b089-cf10c8fd527c</guid><dc:creator>Asbj&amp;#248;rn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m a bit surprised that you measure this from the DK as well. How are you connecting the kit to the spectrum analyzer as these spikes shouldn&amp;#39;t be there at least on the DK. As long as you are happy, we are happy:)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Close-In Spurs - Problem or not?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18079?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:55:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9fe569f8-62fd-4f5a-b7a6-da1e4ac0851b</guid><dc:creator>michael</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Asbjørn. It seems to me that the spurs are actually from the nRF51822 itself - but I may be wrong here. The reason why I think this is the case is that I measure the very same spurs also on the development kits operating from battery. Compared to my design the spurs on the reference boards are about 1-3dB lower. Nevertheless, they don&amp;#39;t seem to cause problems with regulatory and ble radio compliance testing. I don&amp;#39;t know how much they degrade the link budget, but it seems that for my particular appilcation I&amp;#39;m o.k.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Close-In Spurs - Problem or not?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18077?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:34:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:80647bce-f7b6-47e9-8ff0-d500491199ba</guid><dc:creator>Asbj&amp;#248;rn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would try to locate the source of the ~67.2 kHz signal as this will enter the system as noise and could reduce your link budget. Do you have a motor or regulator operating at 67.2 kHz or do you have something else in your circuit that you know operates with this frequency?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normally this kind of noise enter the radio through the power supply to the chip. So I would recommend you to use an oscilloscope and check the VDD pins on the chip. If you see the same noise there you could/should add some additional capacitance to decouple the noise. Add capacitors close the nRF51 chip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let me know if the noise seems to enter the chip through something else and I&amp;#39;m sure we&amp;#39;ll figure out a different way to attenuate the 67.2 kHz noise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>