<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>With Softdevice enabled, the freertos queue receive, once in a while takes around 300 us</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/51894/with-softdevice-enabled-the-freertos-queue-receive-once-in-a-while-takes-around-300-us</link><description>Hello, 
 I am using 
 nordic nrf52 SDK version : v15.2.0 
 Freertos version : V10.0.1 
 The system has hardware timer which runs at 6.4KHz. For every 1.6 KHz, from timercallback, there is one value sent to task using &amp;quot;xQueueSendFromISR&amp;quot;. The task receive</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:11:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/51894/with-softdevice-enabled-the-freertos-queue-receive-once-in-a-while-takes-around-300-us" /><item><title>RE: With Softdevice enabled, the freertos queue receive, once in a while takes around 300 us</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/208640?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 11:11:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8e8099ca-b0ef-4c5a-b61e-70dd640ec26b</guid><dc:creator>Vidar Berg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As you may know, the Softdevice reserved the highest interrupt priorities to handle timing-critical protocol events, see &lt;a title="Processor usage patterns and availability" href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sds_s140/SDS/s1xx/processor_avail_interrupt_latency/processor_usage_patterns.html?cp=3_4_3_0_15_2"&gt;Processor usage patterns and availability&lt;/a&gt;. So application&amp;nbsp;tasks will get blocked from time to time. Would it be possible to&amp;nbsp;execute this timing in the ISR context, and possibly with a higher interrupt priority to mitigate this?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vidar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>