<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>DFU</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52149/dfu</link><description>hi, I&amp;#39;m working with NRF52832, DFU service is configured as secured. my question is : i&amp;#39;m trying to change dfu char a ct e ristic property to &amp;quot;ind i cation&amp;quot; by writing to the dfu descriptor, but no &amp;quot; EVT_GATT_ATTRIBUTE_MODIFIED&amp;quot; event is rec ei ved. my</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:28:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52149/dfu" /><item><title>RE: DFU</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/209875?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:28:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4ba5f1d0-e4ad-4518-ac1a-eb0aa0edf796</guid><dc:creator>dvir</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;hi, thanks&amp;nbsp;for the quick answer. it was&amp;nbsp;informative and helpful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: DFU</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/209749?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:53:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:58cd6b8b-68d2-4594-b9e0-f3ae5f58dcbc</guid><dc:creator>Vidar Berg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assuming you built the application with ble_dfu_bonded.c and not ble_dfu_unbonded.c you need to either be paired or bonded with the device before you can access the butonless DFU characteristics.&amp;nbsp;I would, however, recommend you to&amp;nbsp;consider the &amp;#39;unbonded&amp;#39; variant because it&amp;#39;s simpler. It won&amp;#39;t affect the validation checks inside the bootlaoder.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>