<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Do i have to create a extra Instaburst Instance with the API or does it automaticly by building with the ENABLE_INSTABURST in the CMAKE File ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52419/do-i-have-to-create-a-extra-instaburst-instance-with-the-api-or-does-it-automaticly-by-building-with-the-enable_instaburst-in-the-cmake-file</link><description>Im developing a mesh network based on a custom board using the nRF52832. 
 I fine with sending some bytes over mesh . But now i want so send more bytes over mesh using Instaburst, but im not sure to realize. 
 I found the API and the documentation about</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:06:10 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52419/do-i-have-to-create-a-extra-instaburst-instance-with-the-api-or-does-it-automaticly-by-building-with-the-enable_instaburst-in-the-cmake-file" /><item><title>RE: Do i have to create a extra Instaburst Instance with the API or does it automaticly by building with the ENABLE_INSTABURST in the CMAKE File ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/220724?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:06:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9cb20e75-ce23-4472-87c9-b3be5fe211a8</guid><dc:creator>RSA</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;on the site it says: &lt;img src="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/resized-image/__size/320x240/__key/communityserver-discussions-components-files/4/pastedimage1574150046080v1.png" alt=" " /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does this mean MIC SIZE is MIC=(498 - (OPCODE+overhead))? i the length error:9 when choosing a 400byte&amp;nbsp; transmicsize and sending a 381 byte load.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This may be entirely wrong, but i understand that regular models should be able to switch to the instaburst feature without change after including the &lt;span&gt;EXPERIMENTAL_INSTABURST_ENABLED&lt;/span&gt; in the relevant files. (and ofcourse switching core_tx_adv.c with the instaburst equivalent. ). Is this correct?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Do i have to create a extra Instaburst Instance with the API or does it automaticly by building with the ENABLE_INSTABURST in the CMAKE File ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/211542?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:40:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1a03a401-73b7-4718-b4ee-b639a5fb5bab</guid><dc:creator>JoschkaT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Now im able to send ~377bytes (which is 377 + opcode = 380 bytes ) with the instaburst_tx but when i increase the messagesize, i end in&amp;nbsp;NRF_ERROR_INVALID_LENGTH in check_tx_params as well in&amp;nbsp;segmented_packet_tx where the programm check the maximum package length.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do i have to create an extra message type for instaburst?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Do i have to create a extra Instaburst Instance with the API or does it automaticly by building with the ENABLE_INSTABURST in the CMAKE File ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/211489?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:52:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c5215292-2614-4676-9235-8b91c33942f5</guid><dc:creator>JoschkaT</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I also enabled the &lt;span&gt;EXPERIMENTAL_INSTABURST_ENABLED in die Cmake File.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;When i debugg the project&amp;nbsp;i can see the instaburst_init was&amp;nbsp;called as well as instaburst_(tx,rx)_init and enable.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Is it possible to use the models and instaburst together ?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How i have to build a message to send data with Instaburst? Can i use the typical access_model_publish from the examples ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Where and How the Code decide which advertiser (extended or normal ble) is used ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Do i have to create a extra Instaburst Instance with the API or does it automaticly by building with the ENABLE_INSTABURST in the CMAKE File ?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/211284?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:18:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:67d4b170-f08b-46b9-ba17-075f6c477c87</guid><dc:creator>Mttrinh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To use instaburst, I suggest you have a look at this &lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/com.nordic.infocenter.meshsdk.v3.2.0/md_doc_libraries_instaburst.html?cp=5_2_2_4" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;documentation&lt;/a&gt; especially &amp;quot;Usage in the mesh&amp;quot;. I think instead of&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;ENABLE_INSTABURST you have to use EXPERIMENTAL_INSTABURST_ENABLED.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>