<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Oscillators regarding consumption and wake up time</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52960/oscillators-regarding-consumption-and-wake-up-time</link><description>Hi, I have questions regarding consumption. Especially regarding the Quartz oscillator. I have read stabilisation is up to 0.4ms (very long). There is also the internal RC oscillator that is much quicker : 3us 
 The problem is I am using Softdevice, with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 16:44:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52960/oscillators-regarding-consumption-and-wake-up-time" /><item><title>RE: Oscillators regarding consumption and wake up time</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/213732?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 16:44:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0534f6f9-f9f7-4f25-9f78-e87af2d407ab</guid><dc:creator>Salmat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sorry I am only talking of hfclk !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I have my response, I tested with oscilloscope on some ble examples, and Quartz is only used when requested by nrf_drv_clock_hfclk_request&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The normal execution is on internal oscillator, so it is perfect for me !&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Oscillators regarding consumption and wake up time</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/213658?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 12:45:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3e535627-5f91-4716-bafa-09f8e3d7ae60</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Matthieu&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can see the electrical specifications of the RC oscillator (LFRC) and the crystal oscillator (LFXO) in the &lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.nordic.infocenter.nrf52832.ps.v1.1%2Fclock.html&amp;amp;cp=3_1_0_18_3_2&amp;amp;anchor=unique_937965404"&gt;product specifications here&lt;/a&gt;. The crystal oscillator is by far the most energy-efficient, as it has a lower run current, it doesn&amp;#39;t have to calibrate as the RC does, and it has a lower PPM. The start-up time does not have too much to say, as the LF clock will run as long as the SoftDevice is active anyway.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SoftDevice will start up the LF clock when it is activated, that&amp;#39;s not optional I&amp;#39;m afraid, so you&amp;#39;ll have to use the LF clock in order to use BLE on the chip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>