<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Asymmetric differential rf output in nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5361/asymmetric-differential-rf-output-in-nrf51822</link><description>We have designed a differential antenna for the nRF51822 CEAA chip. 
 Each of the RF output connects through a matching circuit to each one of the two 50-ohm to ground end of the antenna. The transmission lines on the board and matching circuit components</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:43:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5361/asymmetric-differential-rf-output-in-nrf51822" /><item><title>RE: Asymmetric differential rf output in nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18746?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 18:43:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:435bcffa-b9d5-4644-8726-9e7ea4fa2cd5</guid><dc:creator>fontikos</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the info.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Asymmetric differential rf output in nRF51822</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18745?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:09:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1f8839bc-4158-4005-ab28-b8c10850b154</guid><dc:creator>Asbj&amp;#248;rn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In theory yes, they are symmetrical. This will be affected by your matching implementation. Parasitic effects and small difference could change the output by several dB.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We don&amp;#39;t have any further information on the interface that we share as this is a part of advantage towards customers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reason for why we recommend using a single ended antenna is that most antennas for 2.4 GHz are single ended 50 Ohm. For example wifi and regular bluetooth use this as a reference. Also the interface toward spectrum analyzer are often 50 ohm and this makes the testing easier. We just want to make it simple for our customers to implement our radio and antenna into designs and at the same time it to be relatively easy to do output power measurements. Secondly, the matching network also filters the output, so in order to meet regulatory requirement around the world, we recommend to follow our guidelines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>