<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nrf24 vs BLE</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5387/nrf24-vs-ble</link><description>Hello all, 
 In a network of sensors with power constraints in a room which protocol is the best? 
 Newer devices seem to use BLE but I don&amp;#39;t want to discard good old nrf24l01+ 
 Sensors are like accelerometers, flex sensors, gyroscopes, led lights</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:25:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5387/nrf24-vs-ble" /><item><title>RE: Nrf24 vs BLE</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18818?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 00:25:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7df4c3a3-d089-4cd9-8f91-00cff0a9ad75</guid><dc:creator>Liviu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Completely agree! :) Everything takes forever to setup via BT and when it finally works it&amp;#39;s still buggy as hell! I guess I am just venting my frustrations with the Bluetooth protocols :)))&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Nrf24 vs BLE</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18817?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:44:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:5f8ebecc-83b4-448b-99bd-b6a47a41632c</guid><dc:creator>awneil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think comparing BLE to nRF24 is rather like comparing USB to UART.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sure BLE (like USB) adds loads of extra bells &amp;amp; whistles, but that does come at a cost - espececially if you don&amp;#39;t need them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, if you want a highly-optimised solution for a very specific problem a &amp;quot;general-purpose, do-everything&amp;quot; thing like BLE (or USB) is possibly not the way to go.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The downside, of course, is that you won&amp;#39;t be able to just connect straight to any phone, tablet or laptop on the planet - you will have to make adaptors and gateways and suchlike. But, in this case, that is probably not a problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Nrf24 vs BLE</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18816?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:22:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:b3ff3264-493e-414b-b1d4-18790b3977cf</guid><dc:creator>Liviu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;(a very late reply)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I personally find working with the radio communication protocols a lot easier. From my experience reaching the same speeds as the nRF24 via bluetooth is massively difficult (if not impossible) —  however, maybe I just don&amp;#39;t know enough about BLE. The best way I found is to have a receiving device connected directly to your &amp;#39;output device&amp;#39; (phone, laptop, desktop) that prepares the data received wirelessly from various other sensors.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Nrf24 vs BLE</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18815?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:33:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0ce9b908-4b23-405e-bb23-45b3ce5b6cc2</guid><dc:creator>Asbj&amp;#248;rn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You are correct. M0 is much more powerful, but you can do a lot of basic simple stuff with the 8051. For simple sensors it could be a simple method to do it. You will of course have more functionality and power available with the nRF51 and the M0 onboard that one. Good luck.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Nrf24 vs BLE</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18814?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:39:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:c53b71bf-c7cc-49db-98bf-5aaa30c72741</guid><dc:creator>Leonardo</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;8051 isn&amp;#39;t too old for nowadays?
ARM Cortex M0 seem more powerfull or I am wrong?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Nrf24 vs BLE</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/18813?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:09:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:9fecf97c-d9b9-47ea-abcb-f5c7a19ace3c</guid><dc:creator>Asbj&amp;#248;rn</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Using nRF24L01+ is a good solution for the setup you describe. &lt;a href="https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Products/2.4GHz-RF/nRF24LE1"&gt;You can also have a look at the nRF24LE1, which has the same radio, but also a simple 8051 MCU built into to. So you could potentially run everything on one chip. These also come in cost optimized OTP (One-Time-Programmable) variant.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.nordicsemi.com/eng/Products/2.4GHz-RF/nRF24LU1P"&gt;For the computer side you could have a look at the nRF24LU1+ which is the same nRF24L01+ radio, but with an 8051 MCU and a built in USB controller.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>