<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nrf8002 Power consumption and nrRFgo</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5474/nrf8002-power-consumption-and-nrrfgo</link><description>I am designing a product with the nrf8002 chip and have a question on Power consumption. Lets say I leave all the default ratio&amp;#39;s alone and use a CR1620 battery which has 75mah. By default, I get .53 years or about 6 months of battery life. If I adjust</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:29:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/5474/nrf8002-power-consumption-and-nrrfgo" /><item><title>RE: nrf8002 Power consumption and nrRFgo</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/19098?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 15:29:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:4c307d5d-769f-4bb5-8e99-715973f99932</guid><dc:creator>Hung Bui</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stavros,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Adjusting the &amp;quot;Time distribution&amp;quot; is solely use case for current measurement. It has no effect on the real power consumption. In fact all the option in the &amp;quot;Current Consumption&amp;quot; panel has no effect on the real power consumption (the xml configuration file)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current consumption monitor based on the electrical properties in the spec so it will not be 100% accurate. It should be used only as a reference source. You should do actual measurement on your board.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By changing to longer advertising interval, and connection interval you should be able to decrease the current consumption.
Higher ppm, larger slave latency would also help.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, this changes of course have negative effect, such as longer response time, longer connection establishment, slower data rate, higher chance for the connection to break , etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, you need to balance them and find the golden ratio that&amp;#39;s best for your application.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>