<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Question about using nrf52 with 32k XTAL</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/55293/question-about-using-nrf52-with-32k-xtal</link><description>Hello, 
 Quick question.. we are working on a board and running very low on GPIO pins. It would be helpful to remove the low-frequency (32k) XTAL, to recover those pins. The NRF52 will be driving an LED matrix, changing column at about 200-400Hz and using</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:15:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/55293/question-about-using-nrf52-with-32k-xtal" /><item><title>RE: Question about using nrf52 with 32k XTAL</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/224136?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:15:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e76e70dc-6fd5-4e2b-b4b7-9ac5017b9d7f</guid><dc:creator>davidzweig</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for excellent support. :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Question about using nrf52 with 32k XTAL</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/224110?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 09:54:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:080b0cfc-4768-4058-bb61-505ef317236a</guid><dc:creator>Simonr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi David&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The calibration procedure of the RC oscillator is not blocking, TASKS_CAL is called to start the process and when it&amp;#39;s done you&amp;#39;ll receive the EVENTS_DONE event, so this should not interfere with your application&amp;#39;s timing requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As per the &lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.nordic.infocenter.nrf52832.ps.v1.1%2Fpwm.html&amp;amp;cp=4_2_0_46&amp;amp;anchor=concept_pzc_1pw_nr"&gt;PWM specification&lt;/a&gt;, change of polarity, duty-cycle, and base frequency is possible on every PWM period, so there should not be a large delay when setting the PWM duty cycle.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Question about using nrf52 with 32k XTAL</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/224027?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 18:09:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:396e616a-0efb-44d6-85a0-2e0631d68978</guid><dc:creator>davidzweig</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ah, also, I have seen on one at least one microcontroller, that when changing the registers to set PWM duty cycle, it can take 1ms or so for the pin output to reflect the new duty cycle. This can be an issue when driving an LED matrix. Does this issue need to be considered on the nrf52?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>