which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

mohBOSS — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:38:38 GMT

Hi,

the HardFault is no longer taking place. I modified the IRAM1 address in keil like mentioned here

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

Ulrich Myhre — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:58:48 GMT

Yes, I did indeed mean OR :) For compatibility reasons, just initializing the whole struct to zero and not configuring this field at all will work exactly as before.

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

Daniel Tralamazza — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:57:33 GMT

@Ulrich not OR it?

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

mohBOSS — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:51:33 GMT

Thanks Ulrich

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

Ulrich Myhre — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:44:58 GMT

You can now choose if you want to restore only system or user attributes separately, or both if you OR them together (or set to 0, for backwards-compatibility). The intended use here is if you change your database and want to indicate the service changed characteristic to the peer. The user service states from the previous database are then invalid, but the system part should be retained. If you have a static database, restore both.

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

mohBOSS — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:28:39 GMT

Hi Daniel,

I am confused about the two flags : BLE_GATTS_SYS_ATTR_FLAG_SYS_SRVCS and BLE_GATTS_SYS_ATTR_FLAG_USR_SRVCS.

I can not understand which one of them should I use.

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

mohBOSS — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:32:44 GMT

oh! you're right. Thanks again

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

FormerMember — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:27:02 GMT

SDK 7.x.x can be downloaded from developer.nordicsemi.com

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

FormerMember — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:26:02 GMT

Did you remember to switch to the new S120 header files? ble_enable_params_t can be found in ble.h for S120 v2.0.0.

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

Daniel Tralamazza — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:23:26 GMT

Also device_manager_central.c requires 2 changes at lines 1005 and 1263 as sd_ble_gatts_sys_attr_get now requires an extra parameter.

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

mohBOSS — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:15:14 GMT

Hi Kristin,

concerning the ble_enable_params_t type, and sd_ble_enable() function, I could not find them in the S120 library.

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

mohBOSS — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:00:17 GMT

OK, thanks Kristin, I'll try this.

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

mohBOSS — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:57:04 GMT

Hi kaku,

I am not able to find SDK v7.x, I just found SDK v6.1

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

FormerMember — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:48:43 GMT

I have not tested S120 v2.0.0 with SDK 6.1.0, however, below are my suggestions on what you could try:

What could result in a hard fault, is if the IRAM1 address is not correctly set in Keil, see this post.

In addition, since the S120 v2.0.0 supports non-concurrent central and master, the role of your device should be set during stack initialization. It can for example be done the following way (tested in SDK 7.2.0 only..):

static void ble_stack_central_init(void)
 {
    uint32_t err_code;

    ble_enable_params_t ble_enable_params;

    ble_enable_params.gap_enable_params.role = BLE_GAP_ROLE_CENTRAL;
    ble_enable_params.gatts_enable_params.service_changed = IS_SRVC_CHANGED_CHARACT_PRESENT;

    // Initialize the SoftDevice handler module.
    SOFTDEVICE_HANDLER_INIT(NRF_CLOCK_LFCLKSRC_XTAL_20_PPM, false);

    err_code = sd_ble_enable(&ble_enable_params);
   APP_ERROR_CHECK(err_code);

    // Register with the SoftDevice handler module for BLE events.
    err_code = softdevice_ble_evt_handler_set(ble_evt_dispatch);
    APP_ERROR_CHECK(err_code);

    // Register with the SoftDevice handler module for System events.
    err_code = softdevice_sys_evt_handler_set(sys_evt_dispatch);
    APP_ERROR_CHECK(err_code);
}

Also remember to change the header files for S120 that your project links to, to the header files for S120 v 2.0.0, in the following folder: C:\Keil\ARM\Device\Nordic\nrf51822\Include\s120

If using SDK 7.2.0, the new header files should be placed in the following folder: C:\Keil\ARM\Device\Nordic\nRF51_SDK_7.2.0\components\softdevice\s120\headers

RE: which SDK is compatible with S120 v2 ?

kaku — Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:48:35 GMT

Hi,

I'm checking nWP-021 White Paper v1.0 document, S120 v2.x.x supports with nRF51 SDK v7.x.x at table 2 in P7.
How about try SDK 7.x with S120 v2.0 ?

Thanks.