<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Realistic maximum transfer speed RTT</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/56874/realistic-maximum-transfer-speed-rtt</link><description>Hello, 
 
 what is the realistic maximum speed achievable over RTT on the 52840dk (using SEGGER_RTT_printf) to RTT Logger? 
 I have tried modifying frequency and NRF_LOG_BACKEND_RTT_TEMP_BUFFER_SIZE but is getting no where near the specified value. 
</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:19:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/56874/realistic-maximum-transfer-speed-rtt" /><item><title>RE: Realistic maximum transfer speed RTT</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/230615?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:19:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:59ad4cae-5fd0-476a-86b4-521c5875f449</guid><dc:creator>J&amp;#248;rgen Holmefjord</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do not think we have any performance measurements for the Segger RTT functions, these are delivered by Segger and not developed by Nordic. We do have some&lt;a href="https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/sdk_nrf5_v16.0.0/lib_nrf_log.html?cp=7_1_3_26_4#nrf_log_performance"&gt; performance numbers for RTT logging through RTT with NRF_LOG module&lt;/a&gt; which could be relevant. You can see that the number of arguments highly affects the performance of in-place RTT processing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you passing many arguments to the&amp;nbsp;&lt;span&gt;SEGGER_RTT_printf() function? Have you tested with a static buffer and calling&amp;nbsp;SEGGER_RTT_Write instead to see if this affects performance?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Best regards,&lt;br /&gt;Jørgen&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>