<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>TCP and PSM/EDRX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/57208/tcp-and-psm-edrx</link><description>After a lot of thought about the issues with TCP under EDRX or PSM , I have a feature request. 
 I would like if the application layer could know when a TCP socket was sitting on out-of-order receive data or unacknowledged transmit data. 
 Obviously this</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 04:11:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/57208/tcp-and-psm-edrx" /><item><title>RE: TCP and PSM/EDRX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/356462?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2022 04:11:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:313b69ba-f8eb-4ab8-b501-962f2921a931</guid><dc:creator>joebambino</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Curious if you ever had any resolution with this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TCP and PSM/EDRX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/332449?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2021 03:04:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:0f97541a-e68b-4df6-bf79-214506236001</guid><dc:creator>jbrzozoski</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/members/male"&gt;Martin Lesund&lt;/a&gt; Did anything ever come of any of these feature requests?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TCP and PSM/EDRX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/235591?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:2c6d9991-e218-4f41-8edd-211eb0adc186</guid><dc:creator>jbrzozoski</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;TCP keepalive would be useful in many situations on the nRF9160 even without eDRX or&amp;nbsp;PSM simply because most mobile network operators use TCP timeouts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: TCP and PSM/EDRX</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/235430?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:51:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:d6e3e8f6-c665-4a53-a615-157aea6d2be9</guid><dc:creator>Martin Lesund</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your feedback and suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are working on this internally.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>