Thread

RE: Thread

Rob C — Mon, 03 Feb 2020 13:34:31 GMT

Regarding Question 2, which I'll translate as "why would anyone want to use BLE+Thread when they could just use BLE mesh". . .

The Russian IoT article linked above does a good job of demonstrating the benefits of a true, IPv6, routing mesh (Thread) over a flooding approach (BLE mesh). Using both technologies concurrently gives you the best of both worlds -- the power, speed, robustness of Thread with the ubiquity of BLE for smartphone interoperability.

Certain applications where some of the network devices are mobile might also benefit from novel combinations of BLE and Thread -- most routing mesh networks aren't designed for constantly-changing topologies.

RE: Thread

Yossi_Boran — Sun, 02 Feb 2020 19:48:22 GMT

Thanks

RE: Thread

Dmitry — Sun, 02 Feb 2020 18:17:21 GMT

It uses different type of modulation, that requires hardware support

RE: Thread

Yossi_Boran — Sun, 02 Feb 2020 11:21:01 GMT

But IEEE802.15.4 network layer I`ts just software, isn`t it? or it is also Hardware?

Thanks

RE: Thread

Dmitry — Sun, 02 Feb 2020 10:18:54 GMT

Hi,

1. Thread is based on IEEE802.15.4 network layer, nRF52832 doesn't support IEEE802.15.4

2. here adn here are good comparisons between Thread, Mesh and Zigbee