<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Thingy 91  &amp;quot;LTE BLE Gateway&amp;quot; sample</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/57635/thingy-91-lte-ble-gateway-sample</link><description>Hi, 
 In one of your posts , a few monthes ago, you wrote that LTE BLE gatway for thingy is &amp;quot;work on progress&amp;quot;. 
 
 Quote: &amp;quot;We haven&amp;#39;t made this demo for the Thingy:91 yet, but it will be very similar to the &amp;quot;LTE BLE Gateway&amp;quot; sample in nRF Connect SDK</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:19:39 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/57635/thingy-91-lte-ble-gateway-sample" /><item><title>RE: Thingy 91  "LTE BLE Gateway" sample</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/233682?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:19:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e286f39e-5fdc-4b39-b5cd-44bd0b36cfce</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, there is&amp;nbsp;no change from when the post was made. There&amp;#39;s a thread on this matter on the forum:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52689/nrf9160-lte-sensor-gateway-on-thingy-91/225659#225659"&gt;https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/52689/nrf9160-lte-sensor-gateway-on-thingy-91/225659#225659&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a generic note, I would recommend that you use the nRF9160 DK for development purposes, as this is a more versatile platform to connect your own sensors and other external components, given that you have most GPIOs routed to headers. Thingy:91 uses almost all GPIOs, so its harder to add more components to that board.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>