<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>NRF52832  - TIMER0 - GPIOE -PPI, Clock is inaccurate.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/60397/nrf52832---timer0---gpioe--ppi-clock-is-inaccurate</link><description>I have clock drift issue, should I calibrate anything? I test this simple code to get 1second or 100ms signal both of them are inaccurate. 
 here is my code for 100ms; I tested it with a 16mhz timer clock but the result was similar. 
 I am measuring with</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2020 20:47:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/60397/nrf52832---timer0---gpioe--ppi-clock-is-inaccurate" /><item><title>RE: NRF52832  - TIMER0 - GPIOE -PPI, Clock is inaccurate.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/245381?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2020 20:47:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:603c0135-7b7b-423b-a1ee-5b952dae8e7c</guid><dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;for accurate timings, you need to start HFCLK. An internal oscillator has up to 6% tolerance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: NRF52832  - TIMER0 - GPIOE -PPI, Clock is inaccurate.</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/245364?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:27:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:3478977b-59d0-4b48-ac20-1533b2a18b97</guid><dc:creator>MCB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am getting 99.17ms instead of 100ms with above code.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>