why hardfault handler

RE: why hardfault handler

sruthiraj koodathil — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 04:12:19 GMT

Thank you so much RK... its working fine now :-)

RE: why hardfault handler

RK — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:53:26 GMT

the headers are with the softdevice you downloaded.

RE: why hardfault handler

sruthiraj koodathil — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:50:08 GMT

Thanks for your response....

Why am sticking on this is the example was worked for once perfectly with same setup... But tell me from where do i get matching headers for 0.9.0 alpha.... SDK 8.0.0 is correct?

RE: why hardfault handler

RK — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:38:58 GMT

Well as I said in the first mail, the headers in 7.2.0 are for 0.5.0-alpha of the softdevice which doesn't match the version you are loading. You should at least try to compile with the correct headers.

RE: why hardfault handler

sruthiraj koodathil — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:37:03 GMT

yes.... from SDK 7.2.0 itself

RE: why hardfault handler

RK — Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:58:32 GMT

And are you compiling with the headers from that version or the ones in 7.2.0?

RE: why hardfault handler

sruthiraj koodathil — Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:11:57 GMT

am using S130 SD version 0.9

RE: why hardfault handler

RK — Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:02:00 GMT

Which softdevice alpha version? 0.5.0 which is the one embedded in 7.2.0 or 0.9.? which is newer? You should at least compile against the headers of the softdevice version you're using.

And ensure you do actually have the right softdevice on the chip.