<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Expected flash/RAM usage of SUPL library?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/61062/expected-flash-ram-usage-of-supl-library</link><description>I&amp;#39;m currently trying to add SUPL support to our existing product, and I&amp;#39;m finding that the SUPL library is absolutely huge. Enabling CONFIG_SUPL_CLIENT_LIB appears to add on the order of 112 kbytes of flash, and 20 kbytes of SRAM. Is this as expected</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 12:30:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/61062/expected-flash-ram-usage-of-supl-library" /><item><title>RE: Expected flash/RAM usage of SUPL library?</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/248455?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 12:30:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:415c9160-930f-4d49-a66d-5a25cc1e2fc7</guid><dc:creator>H&amp;#229;kon Alseth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]Enabling&amp;nbsp;CONFIG_SUPL_CLIENT_LIB appears to add on the order of 112 kbytes of flash, and 20 kbytes of SRAM.&amp;nbsp; Is this as expected?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;Yes, that is a drawback and the numbers you&amp;#39;re seeing are expected.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Håkon&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>