<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>RF Core NRF52832 vs NRF52810</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/61109/rf-core-nrf52832-vs-nrf52810</link><description>Hey all, 
 
 I would like to make a flexible design with ability to assemble NRF52832 or NRF52810 , both are pin to pin compatible , 
 But i just wonder how to consider regulation issues: 
 
 1. Does this 2 components are sharing same RF Core? 
 2. Do</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 07:13:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/61109/rf-core-nrf52832-vs-nrf52810" /><item><title>RE: RF Core NRF52832 vs NRF52810</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/249089?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 07:13:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e67ba266-212f-4bf6-aa13-d362426d06d5</guid><dc:creator>bjorn-spockeli</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Nir,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There might be minor changes/improvements to the RADIO peripheral between the nRF52832 and nRF52810 as well as other changes. The nRF52810 and nRF52832 are not identical in terms of silicon.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I think you will have certify both designs separately.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bjørn&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RF Core NRF52832 vs NRF52810</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/249045?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 20:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:7f04044c-9bf0-4a9a-83a8-a232a72e7dfb</guid><dc:creator>Upright</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can you advise what is very similar ?&amp;nbsp; in order to use same FCC ID i need to have identical RF structure..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: RF Core NRF52832 vs NRF52810</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/248754?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 14:06:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:1bec45ae-91d8-4f06-9c39-f5b5830b2541</guid><dc:creator>bjorn-spockeli</dc:creator><description>[quote user=""]1. Does this 2 components are sharing same RF Core?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Radio on the nRF52832 and the NRF52810 are very similar.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]2. Do I need different sig registration ?&amp;nbsp;[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;If you use the same IC for multiple similar designs, then it is possible re-use the same listing, like this&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://launchstudio.bluetooth.com/ListingDetails/89624"&gt;https://launchstudio.bluetooth.com/ListingDetails/89624&lt;/a&gt;. Here multiple models of the end product are listed in the same declaration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, I do not think you are allowed to refer to more than one End Product QDID in a single listing. I tried doing this in Bluetooth Launch Studio and I got this error message&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;When referencing more than 1 Qualified Designs, only the following are supported: 1 End Product + 1 or more Profile Subsystems; 1 Controller Subsystem + 1 Host Subsystem + 0 or more Profile Subsystems.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So you might have to refer to the tested components used in the End Product QDID&amp;nbsp; instead&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://launchstudio.bluetooth.com/ListingDetails/RedirectFromQdid/94115" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;94115 (Component (Tested))&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="https://launchstudio.bluetooth.com/ListingDetails/RedirectFromQdid/94418" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;94418 (Component (Tested))&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href="https://launchstudio.bluetooth.com/ListingDetails/RedirectFromQdid/102543" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"&gt;102543 (Component (Tested))&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]3. Do I need different BQB report ?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;We provide End Product QDIDs for both the nRF52810 and nRF52832, so you do not need to go through the qualification process.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, we recommend that customers perform a Bluetooth RF-PHY when performing CE,FCC or ISED certification of the End Product so that you can prove compliance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
[quote user=""]4. Can I use same FCC ID ( if answer for 1 is yes i assume no issue here)?[/quote]
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;As the ICs are not identical I think you will have to perform FCC certification for each of the designs, i.e. one FCC certification for the design with the nRF52832 and one with the nRF52810.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suggest that you ask the testing facility where you plan to do the FCC testing about the Question 2 and 4.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bjørn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>