External Flash (QSPI) vs Internal Flash Write Performance

RE: External Flash (QSPI) vs Internal Flash Write Performance

Simonr — Tue, 26 May 2020 09:32:34 GMT

The QSPI peripheral automatically sends a read status command (opcode: 0x05) for each read/write operation, something that NAND flash doesn't support as far as I know. So what you'll have to do, is to use Sending custom instructions to implement read/write operations for memory devices that don't support this opcode. So you should have this in mind if you're planning on working with a NAND flash.

As for the expected throughput, we tested on Windows with USBDeview and got the following throughput some time back:

Best regards,

Simon

RE: External Flash (QSPI) vs Internal Flash Write Performance

mkimhj — Mon, 25 May 2020 17:45:55 GMT

Hey Simon,

Thanks for the response. If I have an application that requires more than the 1MB onboard flash, is using a NAND flash my best option or are there other alternatives?

And just out of curiosity, do you know what the expected throughput would be of the MX25R6435F?

Thanks!

RE: External Flash (QSPI) vs Internal Flash Write Performance

Simonr — Mon, 25 May 2020 12:31:49 GMT

Writing data to the on-board QSPI will not be very fast as the MX25R6435F is a typical NOR Flash memory chip (datasheet here). it has a high read speed, but a slow write/erase speed. The MX25R6435F is perfect for execute in place (XIP), executing program code directly from external flash. It should be notably faster to write data like this to the nRF52840's onboard flash.

Best regards,

Simon