<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>nRF52840 Receiver Sensitivity and ADDR0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/62081/nrf52840-receiver-sensitivity-and-addr0</link><description>We are using Enhanced Shockbust and would like to maximize the operating range. We noticed this footnote on page 356 of the latest spec sheet (v1.1): 
 Typical sensitivity applies when ADDR0 is used for receiver address correlation. When ADDR[1..7] are</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:26:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/f/nordic-q-a/62081/nrf52840-receiver-sensitivity-and-addr0" /><item><title>RE: nRF52840 Receiver Sensitivity and ADDR0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/293047?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:26:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:e8adbdc4-8152-449d-adb8-ff9a68b0c329</guid><dc:creator>Ivan B.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Joakim,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any updates on this issue?&lt;br /&gt;I also have the same question regarding the BLE stack.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When developing BLE applications is there a way I can avoid the 3dBm loss?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: nRF52840 Receiver Sensitivity and ADDR0</title><link>https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/thread/253487?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:08:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">137ad170-7792-4731-bb38-c0d22fbe4515:8466c884-e442-417f-93d9-5e9b11776bd2</guid><dc:creator>Joakim Jakobsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, like it&amp;#39;s mentioned in the note; The sensitivity applies when ADDR0 is used for receiver address correlation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you using ADDR[1..7]?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#39;t know if it&amp;#39;s any way to avoid this, but I can talk to some colleagues with more experience with ESB and see if they have any suggestions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Br, &lt;br /&gt;Joakim&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>